Tweet
#Electronic preservation of evidence in bullying or neighbour dispute , video surveillance
#Electronic preservation of evidence in case of bulying,mobbing, neighbour dispute, theft
Video surveillance to secure evidence
The private use of electronic means to preserve evidence may be controversial for a variety of reasons. Ever since Chris Howland and later Kurt Felix, Guido Crantz or Frank Elstner made their pranks with the hidden camera, the question has been discussed whether people may be filmed without their knowledge. In the meantime, surveillance cameras have been installed in almost all banks, shopping centres and public authorities. The private use of cameras to protect against burglaries and robberies has also become commonplace.
Disputes between neighbours usually take place in the garden or at the famous border fence, and cameras in all variations are often involved. The use of electronic aids in one's own flat, house or garden is almost (!) always legally legitimate.
However, using them at work, at school or in public is problematic. The question of the extent to which cameras, microphones or other technical aids can be used should therefore be put to a lawyer before they are used. Even if experts are already warning against a "surveillance culture", in many cases it will be very helpful to use the latest developments in electronics.
With a mini camera, inconspicuously mounted on a window of a pen, under the gutter, or next to a satellite dish, a relatively large area can be monitored.
Simple surveillance cameras are available for as little as 30 to 50 euros. With 15 m cable or a wireless camera ...
Read more : http://mobbing.net/beweissicherung.htm
This text is part of the website Mobbing.net
You can publish your suggestions for improvement, text additions, opinions etc. here in the forum.
The texts will be integrated on the website Mobbing.net if they are suitable.
Keywords: electronic preservation of evidence, mobbing, neighbour dispute, video surveillance
#Electronic preservation of evidence in case of bulying,mobbing, neighbour dispute, theft
Video surveillance to secure evidence
The private use of electronic means to preserve evidence may be controversial for a variety of reasons. Ever since Chris Howland and later Kurt Felix, Guido Crantz or Frank Elstner made their pranks with the hidden camera, the question has been discussed whether people may be filmed without their knowledge. In the meantime, surveillance cameras have been installed in almost all banks, shopping centres and public authorities. The private use of cameras to protect against burglaries and robberies has also become commonplace.
Disputes between neighbours usually take place in the garden or at the famous border fence, and cameras in all variations are often involved. The use of electronic aids in one's own flat, house or garden is almost (!) always legally legitimate.
However, using them at work, at school or in public is problematic. The question of the extent to which cameras, microphones or other technical aids can be used should therefore be put to a lawyer before they are used. Even if experts are already warning against a "surveillance culture", in many cases it will be very helpful to use the latest developments in electronics.
With a mini camera, inconspicuously mounted on a window of a pen, under the gutter, or next to a satellite dish, a relatively large area can be monitored.
Simple surveillance cameras are available for as little as 30 to 50 euros. With 15 m cable or a wireless camera ...
Read more : http://mobbing.net/beweissicherung.htm
This text is part of the website Mobbing.net
You can publish your suggestions for improvement, text additions, opinions etc. here in the forum.
The texts will be integrated on the website Mobbing.net if they are suitable.
Keywords: electronic preservation of evidence, mobbing, neighbour dispute, video surveillance