Death by coronavirus or death by quarantine ?
First of all, I wonder about the trillions, billions, tens of millions with which the markets are flooded. One wonderful straw fire after another. It is uncertain what percentage of loss the shareholder will ultimately be left sitting on, but it will probably not be a super stock year.
Besides, at some point the stupidest person asks himself where the money actually comes from. Well, it's not even coming out of the printing press anymore. A simple click of the computer and billions flow. This works until the general public asks itself, what is the money actually still worth? Then precious metals are bought and real estate. Some buy toilet paper.
But back to the topic: Death by coronavirus or death by quarantine?
To make it clearer, the more severe a quarantine is and the longer it lasts, the more victims there are. Extreme example, with a zero supply of the population (super quarantine) a large part would die of hunger after a few weeks.
The current, comparatively loose quarantine affects mainly the small traders. Those who were already clammy anyway are now crossing the Jordan River, initially only on business. Then there are some who are so indebted that they cannot afford unemployment. Well, there is short-time work compensation, but also not unlimited. Anyway, who really believes that the state can absorb all the quarantine-related problems?
Then there are the domestic problems caused by confinement. You can put that away for a few weeks. But for months? That's when it really kicks in. Or else, it'll be very quiet. Dead quiet.
So the government is asked how much quarantine is necessary and how much quarantine is reasonable. Where does the advantage of quarantine end and when does the damage outweigh the benefit?
There is also the famous herd immunity. This means that the number of infections decreases when about 70% of the population is infected. Have you ever calculated how long it takes for a worldwide herd immunity to develop? It's years. Without quarantine.
With quarantine, more people will probably starve to death than die from the virus. So let's forget about herd immunity for now.
There is hope in certain drugs. Something might happen in the next few months.
Personally, I prefer the Korean model. It seems to be working. Great respect for the virus and appropriate measures with a cautious relaxation of quarantine. The "virus lock" will only be opened to the extent that the health system can tolerate it. A kind of balance between human activity and the virus.
Let's see.
Finally, I'd like to look at America. It will probably be decided in the next two weeks whether we go down the drain or not.
First of all, I wonder about the trillions, billions, tens of millions with which the markets are flooded. One wonderful straw fire after another. It is uncertain what percentage of loss the shareholder will ultimately be left sitting on, but it will probably not be a super stock year.
Besides, at some point the stupidest person asks himself where the money actually comes from. Well, it's not even coming out of the printing press anymore. A simple click of the computer and billions flow. This works until the general public asks itself, what is the money actually still worth? Then precious metals are bought and real estate. Some buy toilet paper.
But back to the topic: Death by coronavirus or death by quarantine?
To make it clearer, the more severe a quarantine is and the longer it lasts, the more victims there are. Extreme example, with a zero supply of the population (super quarantine) a large part would die of hunger after a few weeks.
The current, comparatively loose quarantine affects mainly the small traders. Those who were already clammy anyway are now crossing the Jordan River, initially only on business. Then there are some who are so indebted that they cannot afford unemployment. Well, there is short-time work compensation, but also not unlimited. Anyway, who really believes that the state can absorb all the quarantine-related problems?
Then there are the domestic problems caused by confinement. You can put that away for a few weeks. But for months? That's when it really kicks in. Or else, it'll be very quiet. Dead quiet.
So the government is asked how much quarantine is necessary and how much quarantine is reasonable. Where does the advantage of quarantine end and when does the damage outweigh the benefit?
There is also the famous herd immunity. This means that the number of infections decreases when about 70% of the population is infected. Have you ever calculated how long it takes for a worldwide herd immunity to develop? It's years. Without quarantine.
With quarantine, more people will probably starve to death than die from the virus. So let's forget about herd immunity for now.
There is hope in certain drugs. Something might happen in the next few months.
Personally, I prefer the Korean model. It seems to be working. Great respect for the virus and appropriate measures with a cautious relaxation of quarantine. The "virus lock" will only be opened to the extent that the health system can tolerate it. A kind of balance between human activity and the virus.
Let's see.
Finally, I'd like to look at America. It will probably be decided in the next two weeks whether we go down the drain or not.
Kommentar