Reports from a neighbor can have different results.
A worker comes to our house once a week to carry out minor renovations and tidy up the garden. Now our neighbor has associated him with a completely fabricated criminal act. The man had to go to the police and undergo identification procedures. (Fingerprints!) These activities have totally unsettled him.
It was probably the neighbor's intention to put the man under pressure via the police. He was to be unsettled and finally give up work.
Fortunately, I had already had an expert report drawn up on the damage allegedly caused.
This will result in the police dropping the investigation against the worker.
Whether I will be reimbursed for the costs of the expert opinion is questionable. Ultimately, the wrongly accused person is always at a disadvantage.
It's time to make people who deliberately invent accusations pay directly for the costs incurred. Why should the general public pay for the completely unnecessary investigative work of the police for these people?

A worker comes to our house once a week to carry out minor renovations and tidy up the garden. Now our neighbor has associated him with a completely fabricated criminal act. The man had to go to the police and undergo identification procedures. (Fingerprints!) These activities have totally unsettled him.
It was probably the neighbor's intention to put the man under pressure via the police. He was to be unsettled and finally give up work.
Fortunately, I had already had an expert report drawn up on the damage allegedly caused.
This will result in the police dropping the investigation against the worker.
Whether I will be reimbursed for the costs of the expert opinion is questionable. Ultimately, the wrongly accused person is always at a disadvantage.
It's time to make people who deliberately invent accusations pay directly for the costs incurred. Why should the general public pay for the completely unnecessary investigative work of the police for these people?
Kommentar