Tweet
At first, everything looked quite good. The neighbour introduced himself as a respectable businessman and hotel owner. He was friendly and considerate.
You're happy to have a good neighbour.
But the property he had bought had a lot of pitfalls. The sanitary facilities were in need of renovation. The wastewater practically flowed untreated into the nearest stream. The boundary posts had been removed, thus creating the illusion of a larger property. In fact, there was a boundary directly behind the house, which meant that the garden shrank to a few square metres. The pond belonging to the house had not been approved and the water reached right up to the property line. Instead of seeking a dialogue, the neighbour now chose the path of attack, defamation and filing complaints with manipulated evidence.
But the police saw through his dirty game and dropped all the proceedings he had instigated. This showed the public very clearly his true character.
While doing research on the internet, I saw that the hotel had not gone well either. His new project was also not successful. He had to give it up. The resulting debts were placed on the house.
And now the vultures are circling overhead.
I am not happy about this, because a person who has nothing left to lose is particularly dangerous.
Especially those who have been ‘in the sun’ don't feel particularly comfortable in the shade. He believes he has been treated unfairly by people and the world. Instead of looking for the problem in himself, he blames it on others. As a consequence, he continues to reduce his moral concerns and, if necessary, resorts to criminal means to regain his prosperity.
The authorities cannot take preventive action.
I have published this text here because I believe that it will lead to further, probably even greater problems. I would then like to point out that it was to be expected that there would be further unpleasant events. A clear word from the mayors and other authorities could have prevented this.
But who wants to have anything to do with such troublemakers?
You're happy to have a good neighbour.
But the property he had bought had a lot of pitfalls. The sanitary facilities were in need of renovation. The wastewater practically flowed untreated into the nearest stream. The boundary posts had been removed, thus creating the illusion of a larger property. In fact, there was a boundary directly behind the house, which meant that the garden shrank to a few square metres. The pond belonging to the house had not been approved and the water reached right up to the property line. Instead of seeking a dialogue, the neighbour now chose the path of attack, defamation and filing complaints with manipulated evidence.
But the police saw through his dirty game and dropped all the proceedings he had instigated. This showed the public very clearly his true character.
While doing research on the internet, I saw that the hotel had not gone well either. His new project was also not successful. He had to give it up. The resulting debts were placed on the house.
And now the vultures are circling overhead.
I am not happy about this, because a person who has nothing left to lose is particularly dangerous.
Especially those who have been ‘in the sun’ don't feel particularly comfortable in the shade. He believes he has been treated unfairly by people and the world. Instead of looking for the problem in himself, he blames it on others. As a consequence, he continues to reduce his moral concerns and, if necessary, resorts to criminal means to regain his prosperity.
The authorities cannot take preventive action.
I have published this text here because I believe that it will lead to further, probably even greater problems. I would then like to point out that it was to be expected that there would be further unpleasant events. A clear word from the mayors and other authorities could have prevented this.
But who wants to have anything to do with such troublemakers?
Kommentar